Vox Mia - Adding My Voice to the Chorus

Bush’s DOJ and Eliot Spitzer

It doesn’t take a political genius to realize that there’s more to the Eliot Spitzer story than what has been reported.

Soon after the news broke, I commented to friends how there’s another story to be told; a story that includes Wall Street interests, a crusading progressive politician with his eye on the White House, a politized Department of Justice, and, of course, we cannot forget that the Bush Administration still controls the reins of the Executive branch (i.e., they still control the investigative muscle to go after the opposition).

Because of this, I wasn’t too surprised to read this on Harper’s No Comment:

Just after the scandal broke, a number of New York pols told me they were convinced that the Albany Republican establishment knew “all about” Spitzer’s problems well in advance of the press reports. I couldn’t find anything that substantiated this suspicion, but Newsday’s Ellis Henican now presents the first evidence. He interviews Roger Stone, a man known as the ultimate dirty-trickster of New York politics.

    But before I could even make my way to the Capitol to gather up a new pile of reaction statements, my cell phone was ringing from a place even nicer than this. The call-back number said 202, for Washington. But the sunny voice on the other end could only be in Miami.

    Yes, it was Roger Stone. And the exuberance in his voice made high-fiving Albanians sound almost morose. “I didn’t make him go to a prostitution ring,” said the most famous and ruthless Republican dirty trickster who still walks the earth. “He did that all on his own.”

    Stone said that even before I asked if his hand was somehow in Spitzer’s latest trouble. I figured, somehow or another, it had to be. “No comment on that,” Stone said. “I will say I knew it was coming. That’s why I wasn’t too upset about the results of the special election,” where a Democrat grabbed a supposedly safe Republican State Senate seat, leaving Democrats just one vote shy of control.

Maybe this is pure braggadocio. But if Roger Stone did know that all of this was going down then the state’s Republican leadership most likely did too. That would be more powerful evidence of a politically corrupted investigation and prosecution.

This, it goes with out saying, in no way excuses Eliot Spitzer’s blame and total lack of sense, and responsibility. However, it would not come as a great surprise if we later learn that Bush’s Department of Justice launched a fishing expedition with the sole intent to catching a once promising Democratic prize. Yes, the now former governor of New York should’ve known better.

And now to wait for the enterprising journalist that will dig beneath surface, and look pass the sex scandal, and easy story of prostitutes and powerful men.

Senate Dems at Last Learn Lesson

Well, about fucking time… Senate Dems have finally figured out that this republican president cannot be trusted to negotiate in good faith…

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has decided to keep the chamber in session over the Thanksgiving break to block President Bush from making any unsavory recess appointments while Senators are out of town.

[...]

Senate sources said Reid made the decision after he was unable to strike a deal with White House officials that would have allowed swift consideration of several key Democratic picks for the executive branch. In his statement, Reid points to the Federal Communications Commission, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and Nuclear Regulatory Commission as examples where Democratic choices have not been moved along.

[...]

This isn’t the first time Reid has considered keeping the Senate working over a break to prevent recess appointments. Following the Easter recess in which Bush made three controversial installments, Reid threatened to hold pro forma sessions during the monthlong August break.

Looks like Sen. Reid finally learned his lesson.

Whistleblowers’ Cover Blown

From the department of “You gotta be shittin’ me…”

This summer the House Judiciary Committee launched an effort to collect tips from would-be whistleblowers in the Justice Department. The U.S. attorney firings scandal had shown that much was amiss in the Department, and with the danger of retaliation very real, the committee had set up a form on the committee’s website for people to blow the whistle privately about abuses there. Although the panel said it would not accept anonymous tips, it assured those who came forward that their identity would be held in the “strictest confidence.”

But in an email sent out today, the committee inadvertently sent the email addresses of all the would-be whistleblowers to everyone who had written in to the tipline. The committee email was sent to tipsters who had used the website form, including presumably whistleblowers themselves, and all of the recipients of the email were accidentally included in the “to:” field — instead of concealing those addresses with a so-called blind carbon copy or “bcc:”.

How is this even possible… the staff person that sent this out should be castrated and flogged.

Edwards: Collectively We are Powerful

John Edwards was on PBS’s “News Hour with Jim Lehrer” and, well, the man was on fire, seriously. Listening to Edwards one can easily image how his administration would be transformational. More importantly, as far as his candidacy is concerned, if Edwards is able to speak with the same clarity with which he spoke during tonight’s show, his policies and vision for our country can only resonate with the general electorate.

I’ll spare you further commentary and let John Edwards speak for himself (audio is available here):

RAY SUAREZ: [After asking about poverty as a political issue.] But as a presidential candidate, you’re talking to a country, an electorate, where the vast majority of people are not poor.

JOHN EDWARDS: That’s correct.

RAY SUAREZ: And you’re asking them to care, and you’re asking them, in effect, to go somewhere with you in order to change it. Is the country in 2007, 2008, in that kind of mood to listen to that message?

JOHN EDWARDS: Well, it’s going to be the message, whether they listen or not, because I do believe deeply in it. I don’t think poverty is the only issue facing the country. I think the middle class is struggling dramatically.

[...]

But I don’t think we can ignore, because somehow they’re supposed to be forgotten and invisible, the millions of people who, in fact, live in poverty every day in this country.

And I’ll go one step further: I actually believe that it is time for the president — and I would do this as president — to ask Americans to be patriotic about things other than war, to say, “We’re in this together. What we do together matters. And you have to be willing to sacrifice.”

I mean, if you want your country to be what it’s capable of being, then whether it’s on energy conservation, whether it’s on reaching out and helping your fellow Americans who are struggling, that collectively we are powerful, and what we do as a national community really matters. [Emphasis added.]

###

RAY SUAREZ: Well, as someone who has done well, you know the difference of how different kinds of income are treated by the tax code.

JOHN EDWARDS: Yes, I do.

RAY SUAREZ: Have we gotten to a place where working for wages is actually an inferior way of making money?

JOHN EDWARDS: Our tax code treats it as inferior, because my perception is that we value wealth over work. We treat wealth income much better than we treat work income.

[...]

RAY SUAREZ: Now, Americans are aspirational, and that’s one of the reasons why it’s been difficult in our history to have class-based politics. A lot of the people who would be helped by that kind of tax increase, say, “No, no, I want to be that rich person some day.”

JOHN EDWARDS: Oh, yes.

RAY SUAREZ: “So don’t tax the rich.”

JOHN EDWARDS: Well, I’m aspirational. I believe in aspiration. I believe in an America where people can come from nothing and do great things. I mean, that’s the heart and soul of what this country is.

But I think those of us — and that includes me — those of us who have been lucky, who’ve been successful, I didn’t get here by myself. My country was there every step of the way for me, every step of the way, whether it was borrowing money for college, going to a state university, both for undergraduate and graduate school. There’s not been a single place in my life where I did it alone. My country was always there for me. [Emphasis added]

And I think those of us who’ve taken advantage of the extraordinary opportunities that can exist in America, we have some responsibility to give something back. And we don’t want to pull the ladder up behind — at least I speak for myself, I don’t want to pull the ladder up behind me.

###

RAY SUAREZ: You’ve written most recently about restoring America’s reputation. Well, what do you think has happened to America’s reputation, and what would restoring it consist of?

JOHN EDWARDS: I think it’s been destroyed. I think America’s reputation in the world has literally been destroyed. The devastation of the last seven years is almost — it’s literally unprecedented.

And there are a lot of components to reversing that. The way I think about it is to reverse the bad, and then actually do some good. Reversing the bad means ending the war in Iraq; it means closing Guantanamo. The idea that the United States of America would hold anybody against their will without at least the right to some kind of hearing is un-American.

We should not be operating secret prisons; we should not be engaging in anything approaching torture or condoning torture; we should not have any additional spying — illegal, in my judgment — spying on the American people. [Emphasis added.]

Those things are un-American. They need to be stopped, and they will be stopped when I’m president.

But beyond that, the world needs to see America as a force for good again. Today, they see us as bullying, selfish, at war with the Muslim world. That has to change. And so I think there are lots of things we can do to change it.

Instead of spending $500 billion in Iraq, if we spent $3 billion, $3.5 billion a year to help lead an international effort to make education available to 100 million children in the world who have no education, in Africa, in the Muslim world, in Latin America. We can make a huge dent in stopping the spread of disease if sanitation, clean drinking water, were pushed by America at relatively low cost. I mean, I’ve seen from my own work in Africa what an enormous difference that can make.

Economic development, using micro-lending, micro-finance, I mean, it’s very clear to me that America, over time — it wouldn’t happen quickly — but over time could shift the perception that exists in the world today of America as a bullying, selfish country, only interested in expansion of our power, to us once again being the source and the light for opportunity and hope for the rest of the world.

The interview of John Edwards by Ray Suarez was wide raging, as you’ll learn, if you listen to the audio. I was very appreciative that Ray Suarez allowed Edwards ample time to respond to the questions, and that the triviality of the horse-race did not come up. Instead, the interview focused on Edwards’s vision and plan for our country. (You can read the full transcript here.)

Draft Al Gore 2008

This ad appeared in the New York Times… hopefully he’s listening…

Tags: