March 12th, 2006
Talk about shifting blame. This is the March 4th, 2006, cover of the Economist magazine, which in 2003 came out in support of Bush’s war of choice against Iraq.
Of course, the fact is that Iraq finds itself in the current situation because of Bush’s invasion (which the Economist supported) and, too, because the Bush Administration ignored any evidence that contradicted the drive for war. Moreover, once the Bush Administration chose to go to war it painted an overly rosy scenario of what post-invasion Iraq would be like — once more ignoring what even his own State Department experts were saying.
March 12th, 2006
Well, it’s about time that a Democrat took the lead and mounted an offensive against this failure of a president, George W. Bush.
Here’s Senator Feingold on THIS WEEK:
Feingold: It’s an unusual step. It’s a big step, but what the President did by consciously and intentionally violating the constitutional laws of this country with this illegal wiretapping has to be answered. There can be debate about whether the law should be changed. There can be debate about how best to fight terrorism. We all believe that there should be wiretapping in appropriate cases. But the idea that the president can just make up a law in violation of his oath of office has to be answered.
Crooks and Liars brings us the video of the interview.
March 12th, 2006
The other day some workmates and I were discussing the wisdom of exporting manufacturing (and other well paying) jobs abroad under the guise of what I’ve been referring to as Free Market Fundamentalism. Growing up in the United States and being educated here, it is nearly impossible to escape from being convinced of the notion that the so-called free market is always preferable and that, over the long term, that the free market approach is good for average Americans. The product of this inculcation, that is, the belief that the markets know better and, therefore, that the so-called free markets are always right and good, is what I call Free Market Fundamentalism. Looked another way, Free Market Fundamentalism basically amounts to nothing more than blind faith on the Markets; never mind, of course, that the “Markets” are nothing more than a man-made concept and that there’s nothing inherently good nor bad about them… they just are. However, any rational and reasonable person must concede that, as with any other man-made object or concept, the market function better when proper administration is enforced and regulated (thus, at the end of the day, if we think about it critically, there are no “Free Markets,” only “regulated markets”).
At any rate, last night I read an extremely provocative column by Paul Craig Roberts, a Reagan administration economist and staunch conservative. Roberts has criticized the current Bush administration for mismanaging our economy and for creating fewer jobs than at any other period, except for the Great Depression. Here’s some of what he writes:
Nuking the Economy
Forget Iran—Americans Should be Hysterical About This
By Paul Craig Roberts
[...]
Job growth over the last five years is the weakest on record. The US economy came up more than 7 million jobs short of keeping up with population growth.
[...]
Over the past five years the US economy experienced a net job loss in goods-producing activities. The entire job growth was in service-providing activities–primarily credit intermediation, health care and social assistance, waiters, waitresses and bartenders, and state and local government.
US manufacturing lost 2.9 million jobs, almost 17% of the manufacturing work force. The wipeout is across the board. Not a single manufacturing payroll classification created a single new job.
[...]
Semiconductors and electronic components lost 37% of its workforce. The workforce in computers and electronic products declined 30%. Electrical equipment and appliances lost 25% of its employees.
[...]
The knowledge jobs that were supposed to take the place of lost manufacturing jobs in the globalized “new economy” never appeared. The information sector lost 17% of its jobs, with the telecommunications work force declining by 25%.
[...]
In five years the US economy only created 70,000 jobs in architecture and engineering, many of which are clerical. Little wonder engineering enrollments are shrinking. There are no jobs for graduates. The talk about engineering shortages is absolute ignorance. There are several hundred thousand American engineers who are unemployed and have been for years. No student wants a degree that is nothing but a ticket to a soup line. Many engineers have written to me that they cannot even get Wal-Mart jobs because their education makes them over-qualified.
Offshore outsourcing and offshore production have left the US awash with unemployment among the highly educated. The low measured rate of unemployment does not include discouraged workers. Labor arbitrage has made the unemployment rate less and less a meaningful indicator. In the past unemployment resulted mainly from turnover in the labor force and recession. Recoveries pulled people back into jobs.
[...]
Economists who look beyond political press releases estimate the US unemployment rate to be between 7% and 8.5%. There are now hundreds of thousands of Americans who will never recover their investment in their university education.
Unless the BLS is falsifying the data or businesses are reporting the opposite of the facts, the US is experiencing a job depression. Most economists refuse to acknowledge the facts, because they endorsed globalization. It was a win-win situation, they said.
They were wrong.
At a time when America desperately needs the voices of educated people as a counterweight to the disinformation that emanates from the Bush administration and its supporters, economists have discredited themselves. This is especially true for “free market economists” who foolishly assumed that international labor arbitrage was an example of free trade that was benefitting Americans. Where is the benefit when employment in US export industries and import-competitive industries is shrinking?
[...]
Polls indicate that the Bush administration is succeeding in whipping up fear and hysteria about Iran. The secretary of defense is promising Americans decades-long war. Is death in battle Bush’s solution to the job depression? Will Asians finance a decades-long war for a bankrupt country?
You can find the entire column here.
March 10th, 2006
Finally, at long last, one Republican has finally come out of the long stupor of the past five-plus years. Apparently in today’s Joe Scarborough show the former Republican representative said:
HANRETTY: There’s no voice for the Republican Party. It’s not George Bush. It’s not the leadership in Washington, D.C. There’s no one out there talking in support of Republican principles. The Republican principles that helped you in 1994, there’s no one out there right now. If there’s an absolute vacuum of Republican–strong Republican leadership.
SCARBOROUGH: There’s no…
VANDEN HEUVEL… leadership.
SCARBOROUGH: There is no–hold on one second, Katrina. I’ll let you talk in a second. I’ve just got to say this, thought, because I think you’ve touched on an important point, Karen.
The lack of leadership in Washington, D.C., is sickening. If you look at what Republicans did–promised to do in 1994, when they took control of Congress, and see, how they’ve been acting over the past three or four years, the biggest debt and deficit ever. They are irresponsible and reckless on so many levels. I’m embarrassed right now to be a Republican. It’s a disgrace because of the lack of leadership.
And, of course, as we’ve come to expect, the invaluable Crooks & Liars brings us the video.
